From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Dec 26 12:13:06 1994
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id MAA29949 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 26 Dec 1994 12:13:06 -0800
Received: from witch.witchcraft.com (witch.witchcraft.com [198.30.130.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id UAA29943 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Dec 1994 20:13:01 GMT
Received: from warlock.win.net by witch.witchcraft.com id AA11850
  (5.65/1.35 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>); Mon, 26 Dec 94 15:11:58 -0500
Received: by warlock.win.net (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA00978; Mon, 26 Dec 94 15:10:12 EST
From: bugs@warlock.win.net (Mark Hittinger)
Message-Id: <9412262010.AA00978@warlock.win.net>
Subject: problems with routed 941222-SNAP?
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 1994 15:10:03 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 397       
Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


This morning I took apart the new bindist for 941222-SNAP and tried to
upgrade my system by hand.  I must have missed something because routed
now complains "protocol not supported" whenever I try to add a route.

When I boot the 2.0R kernel the problem goes away.  Is this something
that I forgot to copy correctly from the new bindist or is the 941222-SNAP
kernel at fault?  Any ideas welcome.