From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 18 22:08:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF501D9; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com (mail-we0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240B2680; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id r5so2876474wey.11 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:08:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=C3/MZJRJnL8BFXM7PnIAvnHcbQ1/jpke2AY8CPU+Eig=; b=KoTT0NcyxpsvP99liD6pLKAQUqhLtTmxEVfIEB9vPlIfqL/vGwEjKQeutd44QeQbbA IgnkzcgTjgpqJM+J4g8SpHM4D/XUAeWoKMc6w518ksTMSCBFGZSkq9lim8AUi5kMGlk7 pyEfWNrIRYpaAC5zDQhBrn/wxXKR8ijInnDZ1w5bchvjGC/ZtPDJTM4WDdfDizkb5nMN Qdwqp23qZseb/gaUTM6mRPiTNBsQBL1Dm9uFJ/VXRrH8x0kRAeIJKD7MWPxTKUQWFfjS WAf6rCJSgxzq2PuIzmJzvAv0jYgffSWp24mR5am4Q0iteEX4+ix/i63TM3yLtXoDypHR Vp5g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.142.236 with SMTP id rz12mr21915556wjb.12.1366322916219; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.88.129 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:08:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2163177.OYO9r9Iusv@home.alkar.net> References: <51702dc6.87ee440a.57aa.327e@mx.google.com> <3111674.jLbKQKCHzF@home.alkar.net> <2163177.OYO9r9Iusv@home.alkar.net> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:08:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623. From: Adrian Chadd To: Artyom Mirgorodskiy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:08:37 -0000 On 18 April 2013 15:07, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: > See attached > What the hell? Those masks are really wrong. Try adding this line after it: ath_hal_printf(ah, "%s: pcap rx=0x%x, tx=0x%x; configured rx=0x%x, tx=0x%x\n", __func__, pCap->halRxChainMask, pCap->halTxChainMask, rx_chainmask, tx_chainmask);