From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 05:41:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34D616A4CE for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 05:41:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao03.cox.net (lakermmtao03.cox.net [68.230.240.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B6B43D2F for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 05:41:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob89@bobj.org) Received: from mail.bobj.org ([24.250.218.207]) by lakermmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050305054120.JXGC16861.lakermmtao03.cox.net@mail.bobj.org> for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 00:41:20 -0500 Received: from bobj.dyndns.org ([192.168.132.161]) (AUTH: PLAIN bobj, ) by mail.bobj.org with esmtp; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 00:41:19 -0500 From: Bob Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, wayne@staff.msen.com Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 00:41:12 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050305043936.5339.qmail@web53903.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050305043936.5339.qmail@web53903.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503050041.12634.bob89@bobj.org> Subject: Re: Are quotas possbile on md filesystems? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 05:41:21 -0000 On Friday 04 March 2005 11:39 pm, stheg olloydson wrote: > it was said: > > > > >So after all that, NOW I notice that there is already a published > >patch for this: > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/74105 > > > >Oh, well. It was an amusing exercise. > > > >- Bob > > Eh? Maybe _I_ am the one missing something. The link you provided goes > to a patch for IPX. The only PRs for mdmfs I find are bin/57641, 64153, > and 66763, and those do not seem to deal with this issue. I think you > ought to submit your patch because mdmfs' default behavior is a > problem. > Argh! I'm going to stop posting until I've had some sleep. But it does appear to me that bin/57641 addresses the same issue as my patch: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/57641 - Bob > Regards, > > stheg >