Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:45:10 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Max Khon <fjoe@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_K=F6vesd=E1n?= <gabor@t-hosting.hu> Subject: Re: svn commit: r228143 - in head: . share/mk tools/build/options Message-ID: <590FF4B6-8185-4ED3-B72A-240803F7ADF6@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <4ED545A9.8000304@FreeBSD.org> References: <201111291946.pATJkHMs064094@svn.freebsd.org> <4ED544E1.3050307@t-hosting.hu> <4ED545A9.8000304@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[[ I know it is a bit late here ]] On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 11/29/2011 12:47, G=E1bor K=F6vesd=E1n wrote: >> On 2011.11.29. 20:46, Max Khon wrote: >>> Log: >>> Turn off profiled libs build by default. >>> Can be enabled back using WITH_PROFILE=3Dyes in /etc/src.conf >> I think it was useful. Profiling is useful for developing any piece = of >> software that builds on libc or other common libs, even for software >> that is not directly related to FreeBSD. I think it should be = reverted. >=20 > Since we ask users to read -current, it would be useful if our > developers did too. :) But that's not the place to discuss this... It should have gone through = arch@ not current@ > As Max pointed out in his message about this, the profiled libs are = only > really useful to a tiny percentage of developers. If you need them, > twist the knob. Building them should be off by default. I can't profile my programs effectively without them. Am I now forced = to build profile libs with a full FreeBSD to get them? Seems like a big = step backwards. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?590FF4B6-8185-4ED3-B72A-240803F7ADF6>