From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 2 17:16:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2FA51065670 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 17:16:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward7.mail.yandex.net (forward7.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:202::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7FD8FC08 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 17:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp9.mail.yandex.net (smtp9.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.35]) by forward7.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 7EB221C37B1; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 21:16:46 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1328203006; bh=yhYnpop8Kcv46h9D70k5q7ObRAy8aPlnYvar4vibPvA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=qbEJzKWC9Gl1qi4kptRulzz3E3l23bv+AChUvhaxbZFjw6VQFkT5FXlLxdlJmipH+ gLOSJI5wLomvlHI50/RWI0Fgd00/fMqsfv3v2gzLrc1f6h2M6+n5430sttow+iwy/U iATku/1jO7xvnT4+yhxBD94DIge44db0TFFcrLxE= Received: from smtp9.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp9.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 59BC01520506; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 21:16:46 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1328203006; bh=yhYnpop8Kcv46h9D70k5q7ObRAy8aPlnYvar4vibPvA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=qbEJzKWC9Gl1qi4kptRulzz3E3l23bv+AChUvhaxbZFjw6VQFkT5FXlLxdlJmipH+ gLOSJI5wLomvlHI50/RWI0Fgd00/fMqsfv3v2gzLrc1f6h2M6+n5430sttow+iwy/U iATku/1jO7xvnT4+yhxBD94DIge44db0TFFcrLxE= Received: from unknown (unknown [77.93.52.19]) by smtp9.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id GjEWSvCN-GjEaubtC; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 21:16:46 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:16:44 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?0JrQvtC90YzQutC+0LIg0JXQstCz0LXQvdC40Lk=?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KfQnyDQmtC+0L3RjNC60L7QsiwgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <944787000.20120202191644@yandex.ru> To: Adrian Minta In-Reply-To: <4F2AB53D.7080503@gmail.com> References: <4F29A464.3080302@zonov.org> <4F2AB53D.7080503@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: netisr defered - active only one thread X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?utf-8?B?0JrQvtC90YzQutC+0LIg0JXQstCz0LXQvdC40Lk=?= List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:16:48 -0000 Здравствуйте, Adrian. Вы писали 2 февраля 2012 г., 18:09:33: AM> A multiqueue network card may help, like a dualport Intel igb E1G42ET. actually it is not. Intel have hardware separation to interrupts. So having only pptp trafic on interface cause next problem: only one thread process packets instead of 4 posible. -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru