From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul 28 17:51:57 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CF21065674
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:51:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@godfur.com)
Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [64.81.218.253])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1680B8FC42
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:51:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@godfur.com)
Received: (qmail 60978 invoked by uid 1008); 28 Jul 2008 18:57:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO kalins-macbook-pro.local)
	(kalin@el.net@74.1.12.115)
	by mail.el.net with ESMTPA; 28 Jul 2008 18:57:19 -0000
Message-ID: <488E0708.2060207@godfur.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:51:04 -0400
From: kalin m <mail@godfur.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: pci compliance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:51:57 -0000

hi all...

i'm about to submit a freebsd system to be scanned for pci compliance...

is there any particular gotchas with bsd systems that can be detected at 
the time of pci compliance scanning?
i know they use something like nmap if not nmap itself and i did myself 
on that machine and didn't find anything interesting.
but one of the consultants that was 'advising' the company i work for 
said "we use similar (as in nmap) approach but it's (much) more 
intrusive". anybody knows what does that mean?

thanks...