From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 20 20:40:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126EF332; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 20:40:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (base.exwg.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:50a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8815E0E; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 20:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36ECB6003CD; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:40:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Scanned: by amavisd-new at exwg.net Received: from smtp.burggraben.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns.burggraben.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oQzAJCQYGY9e; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:39:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net [IPv6:2001:470:7b43:1:6a05:caff:fe01:aae9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (verified OK)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:39:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8F6EB30E80; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:39:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:39:58 +0200 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: David Thiel Subject: Re: graphics/shotwell needs a new home Message-ID: <20130420203957.GA2074@elch.exwg.net> References: <20130403204322.GA20813@redundancy.redundancy.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130403204322.GA20813@redundancy.redundancy.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 20:40:02 -0000 Hi, ## David Thiel (lx@freebsd.org): > A year or two ago, I fixed up shotwell and took maintainership from > gnome@. Unfortunately, the build broke a month ago or so, and it needs > some love from someone much more familiar with gnomeisms to make it > functional. gnome@ has indicated they don't want it back, for which I > can't necessarily blame them. > > Is there some brave soul that might be willing to adopt it? Is there a volunteer yet? If not - I massaged it into a "works for me" state. I'm just about to file some PRs for upgrading shotwell, if nobody else has already adopted this port, I'll take maintainership. Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space