From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat Mar 10 08:02:03 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55762F2C4EB; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 08:02:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B34968EE6; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 08:02:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id F17FD1C1CC; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 08:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 08:02:02 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Bryan Drewery Cc: "Danilo G. Baio" , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler Subject: Re: svn commit: r464037 - head/irc/znc Message-ID: <20180310080202.GA18340@FreeBSD.org> References: <201803100016.w2A0GnR8013646@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 08:02:03 -0000 On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 05:58:31PM -0800, Bryan Drewery wrote: > This is a note in general, not specifically at you. But https for > distfiles only achieves 2 things: 1. Privacy against someone snooping > that you are downloading ZNC (is it really that important?) but still > can see your DNS and connections to the ZNC site... and 2. It breaks > proxy caching. So I don't think MASTER_SITES should be converted to > https in general. There's this odd push for it lately but I don't see > the benefit. Big +1 (HTTPS for distfiles is somewhat of a PITA for me as well). Can we please go back to plain good HTTP? SHA256 provides enough assurance against intermittent tampering with the distfiles. ./danfe