From owner-freebsd-geom@freebsd.org  Fri Jul  3 05:05:43 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4CA993500
 for <freebsd-geom@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri,  3 Jul 2015 05:05:43 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B87221D8
 for <freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org>; Fri,  3 Jul 2015 05:05:43 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t6355gT0023187
 for <freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 05:05:42 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 197309] ggatec broken since r238119 (ioctl(/dev/ggctl): Invalid
 argument)
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 05:05:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: bin
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-STABLE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, needs-qa, patch, patch-ready, regression
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable10?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc version bug_status short_desc flagtypes.name
 bug_file_loc keywords
Message-ID: <bug-197309-14739-FVepnQl3VM@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-197309-14739@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-197309-14739@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
 <freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-geom>,
 <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
 <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 05:05:43 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197309

Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |koobs@FreeBSD.org,
                   |                            |pjd@FreeBSD.org
            Version|10.0-RELEASE                |10.1-STABLE
             Status|New                         |Open
            Summary|ggatec has been broken      |ggatec broken since r238119
                   |since rev 238119            |(ioctl(/dev/ggctl): Invalid
                   |                            |argument)
              Flags|                            |mfc-stable10?
                URL|                            |https://svnweb.freebsd.org/
                   |                            |base?view=revision&revision
                   |                            |=238119
           Keywords|                            |easy, needs-qa,
                   |                            |patch-ready, regression

--- Comment #8 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
Thank you for the patch Fabian.

CC original committer (pjd) for what appears to be very simple (and confirmed)
fix, for resolution in 10.2-RELEASE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.