From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed May  5  4:56:23 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from kyrnet.kg (news.kyrnet.kg [195.254.160.9])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1350314BC9
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  5 May 1999 04:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from fygrave@tigerteam.net)
Received: from localhost by kyrnet.kg (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA26117;
	Wed, 5 May 1999 16:46:55 +0500 (GMT)
X-Authentication-Warning: kyrnet.kg: fygrave owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 16:46:55 +0500 (GMT)
From: CyberPsychotic <fygrave@tigerteam.net>
X-Sender: fygrave@kyrnet.kg
To: Brian Feldman <green@unixhelp.org>
Cc: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG,
	tech@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: io ports reading/writing
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9905050742530.43394-100000@janus.syracuse.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.05.9905051641490.632-100000@kyrnet.kg>
Confirm-receipt-to: fygrave@usa.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

~ > 
~ > I don't quite understand the i386 architecture at this level but I seem to
~ > remember that this support would require significant changes in the way we
~ > handle processes and there might have been some performance implications.
~ > I don't think its a big problem in practice.
~ 
~ What about i386_[gs]et_ioperm()?
~ 

is it documented anywhere? `find /usr/share/man -name '*386*'' showed me
only manual page for i386_[gs]et_ldt which is a different thing.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message