From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 24 07:08:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB97616A40F for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooklyn@flinet.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5CF13C463 for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooklyn@flinet.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 24 Dec 2006 01:38:12 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MRU74898; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 01:38:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from 207-237-238-113.c3-0.avec-ubr15.nyr-avec.ny.cable.rcn.com (HELO ACER1) ([207.237.238.113]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 24 Dec 2006 01:38:12 -0500 From: "Steven" To: Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 01:38:07 -0500 Message-ID: <018e01c72726$12e75720$0201a8c0@ACER1> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AccnJgx8+PmtDT1uTFWlPD4XHc47Uw== X-Junkmail-Status: score=42/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=suspect(7), refid=str=0001.0A090209.458E1EE2.0015,ss=2,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.121/2006-09-27 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Snap Server File System X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:08:14 -0000 =20 =20 Tom, =20 I just read your answer to David and Eric on the Snap 1100. =20 I spoke with Adaptec who I am sure you know inherited this from Quantum. = They told me that BSD is also used on the 4100 and 4500 raid systems. I would like to know where you found out from, unless you can answer me about the software raid, what stripe size they used. I will assume for = the moment that they used BSD default. My other Question is about the extra drive for parity which I understand = is not implemented yet If so Quantum would have to have implemented it. Do you have any sources, web sites or reading information I can go to = that will save my time of trial and error.=20 I am working with a 4100, one of the drives dropped out and the raid 5 didn=92t hold up. The chipset is standard promise 100ATA x2 to handle all 4 drives as = master. =20 =20 Any info you can give me would be helpful =20 =20 Thank you, Steven --=20 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/598 - Release Date: = 12/22/2006 3:22 PM =20