From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 23 10:25:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19768FA9; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 10:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (gw.catspoiler.org [75.1.14.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1E7E20C6; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 10:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id rANAOiVS023613; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 02:24:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201311231024.rANAOiVS023613@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 02:24:44 -0800 (PST) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: Anyone else seeing uma_zalloc_arg panics? To: markm@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <6527E3D8-55D8-45B9-80F1-3AC83250F02A@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 10:25:01 -0000 On 23 Nov, Mark Robert Vaughan Murray wrote: > Hi * > > Anyone else seeing panics like this? > > This is CURRENT, amd64, 2 CPUs, source synced on Thursday 21st Nov evening GMT sometime. > > +panic: uma_zalloc_arg: Returning an empty bucket. > +cpuid = 1 > +KDB: stack backtrace: > +db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfffffe003c7dd820 > +kdb_backtrace() at kdb_backtrace+0x39/frame 0xfffffe003c7dd8d0 > +vpanic() at vpanic+0x126/frame 0xfffffe003c7dd910 > +kassert_panic() at kassert_panic+0x136/frame 0xfffffe003c7dd980 > +uma_zalloc_arg() at uma_zalloc_arg+0x49a/frame 0xfffffe003c7dd9f0 > +bucket_alloc() at bucket_alloc+0x8b/frame 0xfffffe003c7dda10 > +uma_zfree_arg() at uma_zfree_arg+0x2a1/frame 0xfffffe003c7dda70 > +bucket_cache_drain() at bucket_cache_drain+0x1b/frame 0xfffffe003c7ddaa0 > +zone_drain_wait() at zone_drain_wait+0xd1/frame 0xfffffe003c7ddb00 > +uma_reclaim() at uma_reclaim+0x42d/frame 0xfffffe003c7ddb30 > +vm_pageout() at vm_pageout+0x3bc/frame 0xfffffe003c7ddbb0 > +fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x84/frame 0xfffffe003c7ddbf0 > +fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfffffe003c7ddbf0 > +--- trap 0, rip = 0, rsp = 0xfffffe003c7ddcb0, rbp = 0 --- > +KDB: enter: panic > > M Yes, I got one of these a couple days ago: Just curious ... are you running i386 or amd64? My test machine is i386, but I suspect that most people running head are running amd64.