From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 9 23:25:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9165C106567A for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 23:25:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us) Received: from dsl254-019-221.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net (dsl254-019-221.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.19.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D53E8FC0C for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 23:25:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us) Received: (qmail 84928 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2008 23:25:28 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 9 Jun 2008 23:25:28 -0000 Message-ID: <484DBBE7.6080908@zircon.seattle.wa.us> Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:25:27 -0700 From: Joe Kelsey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080503) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Closing the Jo Rhett argument X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 23:25:28 -0000 Jo Rhett has clearly stated (in offline reply) that they do not participate in the -BETA and-RC cycles leading up to -RELEASE, so they therefore do not have any issues with -RELEASE and EoL to raise. Actually, they still have the same complaints to raise about EoL, but since they refuse to participate in the -RELEASE process, they do not have valid points to raise. I ask that everyone please stop communicating with the persona known on this list as "Jo Rhett" unless and until they participate in the -BETA, -RC, and -RELEASE process. You cannot raise any sort of valid complaint about -RELEASE, EoL or bugs if you do not participate in finding bugs during the -BETA and -RC stages prior to the -RELEASE. If you instead choose to try to run -RELEASE and find bugs then, then complain about the bugs you found and continue to complain that these bugs were not found by someone else and fixed ahead of time, you have no issues and do not deserve an answer, no matter how much you try to frame it as a "policy" question. /Joe