From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 01:14:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032EF16A4CE; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:14:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC6743D49; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:14:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mobile.pittgoth.com (ip68-230-188-82.dc.dc.cox.net [68.230.188.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j1S1DtKw091905 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:14:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:13:41 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: Christian Brueffer Message-ID: <20050227201341.0ebcaa8b@mobile.pittgoth.com> In-Reply-To: <20050228005605.GB611@unixpages.org> References: <200502271549.j1RFn7iv005043@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050227221947.GA73162@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20050228005605.GB611@unixpages.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Christian Brueffer Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/powerd powerd.8 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:14:02 -0000 On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:56:06 +0100 Christian Brueffer wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:49:47AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > > On Sunday, 27 February 2005 at 15:49:07 +0000, Christian Brueffer wrote: > > > brueffer 2005-02-27 15:49:07 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD src repository (doc committer) > > > > > > Modified files: > > > usr.sbin/powerd powerd.8 > > > Log: > > > man page -> manual page > > > > I don't think this is correct. They've always been called "man > > pages". Using a different term is confusing and may raise doubts as > > to what is meant. > > > > As Tom pointed out as well, we have been using "manual page" throughout > our documentation for quite some time now. > > Personally I prefer it over "man page" because it is clearer and "sounds > better". And as has been pointed out, we use the term "manual page" a lot more over "man page." About 1000 hits more. :) Greg ... you still owe me some review. poke poke :) -- Tom Rhodes