From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Nov 15 08:40:04 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA16975 for bugs-outgoing; Sat, 15 Nov 1997 08:40:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA16960; Sat, 15 Nov 1997 08:40:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 08:40:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199711151640.IAA16960@hub.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs Cc: From: Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: bin/5050: upgrade perl Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The following reply was made to PR bin/5050; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Poul-Henning Kamp To: Evan Champion Cc: ac199@hwcn.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/5050: upgrade perl Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 17:37:22 +0100 In message , Evan Cha mpion writes: >On Sat, 15 Nov 1997, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > >> No. This bugreport should include the proper bmake style >> makefiles, and any other changes, removals, etc. that would be >> necessary for perl5 before it goes into the main system. >> >> Same goes for the previous Tcl upgrade and bind upgrade requests >> you sent. > >I just report the problem. Am I supposed to do everything? If I was >interested in doing that I'd get CVS update access and do it myself. Uhm, actually: yes. The FreeBSD effort to a large extent works because people submit substance, not just requests for it. So, why not give a hand ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."