Date: 19 Feb 2002 16:46:45 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch sets to date and timing tests with Giant out of userret. Message-ID: <xzp4rkdwk2i.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20020219153913.GD13590@electricjellyfish.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0202190120570.56008-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <xzplmdpwln3.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020219151845.GA13590@electricjellyfish.net> <xzpd6z1wkt8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020219153913.GD13590@electricjellyfish.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:30:43PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > *shrug* so we need a port of a devel version of apr. It's what the > > scientific community calls an "engineering problem" :) > at the moment, the primary thing holding me back is the fact that > the apr people, while they do distribute tarballs of the devel version > of apr, they don't keep them around, so there wasn't a tarball to > point the port to that would be good for more than 5 days. that, > combined with the fact that subversion tends to track apr really > closely, so we would end up needing to update the port a lot, has kept > me from putting too much time into an apr port. The first problem is solveable by storing tarballs on freefall and using that as MASTER_SITE. The second (assuming the changes are mostly to the code and not to the build infrastructure) is a non- problem; if you keep me informed whenever a new tarball is out, I'll keep the port up-to-date. Do you have a port skeleton for apr? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp4rkdwk2i.fsf>