From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 4 08:47:58 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA04358 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 08:47:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gateway.sitel.net ([206.24.48.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA04336 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 08:47:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jsw@cywub.sitel.net) Received: from dns3.sitel.net by gateway.sitel.net via smtpd (for hub.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.18]) with SMTP; 4 Jan 1999 16:47:22 UT Received: from dev2.sitel.net (mail1.sitel.net [10.252.249.17]) by www.sitel.net (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA16572; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 10:44:41 -0600 Message-Id: <199901041644.QAA29863@cywub.sitel.com> Subject: ISC and FBSD (was Re: SCO Vrs. FreeBSD) To: didier@idefix.omnix.net (Didier Derny) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 10:44:37 -0600 (CST) From: Jack Winslade Cc: freebsd@netsys.hn, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Didier Derny" at Jan 4, 99 05:06:57 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL20] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I've been using SCO and Interactive Unix in the past. > they were officialy supported products, > - I'm still waiting to the answer for the problems I had before 1994... I am one of those who still maintains one legacy ISC system. (Does Sun still sell/support this, or even admit it exists ?? ;-) It runs side by side with two FBSD machines. Of the three, the ISC requires far more daily handholding. One of my dreams/goals is to get everything on that box moved over to FBSD, but there are both hardware and software complexities. When it comes to installing a new port of (whatever) I usually figure that it will take 2-3 times as much time to get it up and stable on the ISC box as it will on the FBSD machines. Good day JSW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message