From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 2 7: 8:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from twilight.tpgi.com.au (twilight.tpgi.com.au [203.29.147.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5586215138 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 07:08:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@twilight.tpgi.com.au) Received: (qmail 4171 invoked by uid 1002); 2 Aug 1999 14:07:01 -0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:07:01 +1000 (EST) Reply-To: chrisk@tpgi.com.au From: Chris Keladis To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: ed0 or ed1? Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I am experiencing some rather odd results with my FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE box. For some reason my PCI RealTek (NE-2000 clone) network card is detecting as ed1 rather than the first (read: only) network card in the system. Does this have something to do with strange motherboard PCI slot ordering? A sample dmesg output: ed1: rev 0x00 int a irq 10 on pci0.11.0 ed1: address 00:00:01:00:a6:f7, type NE2000 (16 bit) And in the kernel config file, i've specified: device ed0 I thought this might have something to do with specifying ed0 as a device, and the card gets logically assigned ed1, but the NIC wont detect at all without that line. It works fine as it is, i guess, but i am very curious to work this one out :-) Regards, Chris. ---------------------------------- Chris Keladis TPG Internet System Administrator E-Mail: Chris Keladis Local Date: 03-Aug-99 Local Time: 00:01:08 ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message