Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 14:02:20 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: Dany <dany_list@natzo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD AGP or Nvidia AGP? Message-ID: <20040105130220.GL74113@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <3FF95CBD.8060304@natzo.com> References: <3FF95CBD.8060304@natzo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--11Y7aswkeuHtSBEs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 07:46:53AM -0500, Dany wrote: > What is the preferred method ? .... The one that would give the most=20 > stability (I don't really care about performance and fps). Just one thought: if you don't want 3D support, just go with the 2D 'nv' driver -- that should be stable. --Stijn --=20 What would this sentence be like if it weren't self-referential? --11Y7aswkeuHtSBEs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/+WBcY3r/tLQmfWcRAoGjAJ0WNn7Sz9rChrfdIolAsyS5+ELcdQCgjYNi vn/UeVw6J4zMJCMaWtuvOqI= =yb0v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --11Y7aswkeuHtSBEs--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040105130220.GL74113>