From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Oct 10 01:20:45 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA02294
          for stable-outgoing; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 01:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable)
Received: from gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com (root@gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com [207.113.159.21])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA02289
          for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 01:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from gdonl@tsc.tdk.com)
Received: from sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com (root@sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com [192.168.241.191])
          by gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id BAA00710; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 01:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com (salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com [192.168.241.194])
	by sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA07882;
	Fri, 10 Oct 1997 01:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gdonl@localhost)
	by salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA10480;
	Fri, 10 Oct 1997 01:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com>
Message-Id: <199710100819.BAA10480@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 01:19:57 -0700
In-Reply-To: igor@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu (Igor Roshchin)
       "Re: Version of FreeBSD for production server?" (Oct  9,  2:34pm)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 alpha(3) 7/19/95)
To: igor@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu (Igor Roshchin), chad@dcfinc.com
Subject: Re: Version of FreeBSD for production server?
Cc: tarkhil@mgt.msk.ru, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Oct 9,  2:34pm, Igor Roshchin wrote:
} Subject: Re: Version of FreeBSD for production server?
} If you have ADAPTEC-2940, AFAIK, 2.2 has all the problems solved,
} while 2.1.7-RELEASE (and to the best of my knowledhe, 2.1-STABLE) still
} have them unsolved.

I ported the latest ahc driver from the 2.2 branch back to 2.1 about a
month ago and convinced Justin to commit it to the tree.  If you've
fetched 2.1-stable since then, you should be in luck.

That said, I'm planning on moving from 2.1 to 2.2 as soon as I can
find the time (and a spare machine) to port my local changes to 2.2.

			---  Truck