From owner-dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Tue Jun 1 06:56:07 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: dev-commits-src-main@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F114064C3EA; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 06:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FvNGv6RjPz3jPn; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 06:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1622530567; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jjT+Tt36UBpGHw/X371etCTuJsmnOQnLUEVnhmNDpaY=; b=wJv4jZ+Mb+sYy8+crCQvs25Dt6uWwb2ZIhTp+51FoJbFAI5UzhR+O4zrPC6wVcTRyPn+k+ L2ZlsrtR+o9uvVLxCuXduEvEX67jfDe7iyFbySjrxUzpBd+HGQCKqcnp0T0ip8kIosnRRX U+hkP2py0X6hmvcD1YEmtk3i3jTZxh7w2aui9cd82qFQOHXimGODMsi/KwhopdwjVYurGm uxq+G+f4y+fPi8MuszMK8oEC6u9XSm4dZXeK93UQ3qy26Z4Epmn26yt+kZaKQ4yMtzidGf FINKeSyJo4DYUJIpdjej+gPNH509L4naninsBrGOMmflDBQqOoU8SXKoTf7NqA== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id C69A1D26A; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 06:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 06:56:07 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Alan Somers Cc: Jessica Clarke , Warner Losh , Ed Maste , src-committers , "" , dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 5a20c351ea45 - main - [skip ci] add a CODEOWNERS file Message-ID: References: <202105302249.14UMnbcl094541@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <0434E9D2-B0AA-4B5E-942A-A393A83DFFD1@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1622530567; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jjT+Tt36UBpGHw/X371etCTuJsmnOQnLUEVnhmNDpaY=; b=qEj63/+g1fHAo6fall+xKYl6nn43Dc0pzqcfj8yu8v8jKDtfPd5qcBralD1C9OFyEyIAjo Tfu6m8c8U7DMTmRmk/fRRNyUgFkwYCWKp+p1nWdgXcUIGhXz27hc/19dB0F38oJLKfvLIS s/JuRIFBbZwpDN6D5cfWbaEZdbJ5XS6CaVEesCog96clSLWrbUPX++swc9VnkvlXpMRci7 009s6+6aKqyg6NUZDSov7HWWd65WTe/uPFXMknVTnqdadV+XOetK7/GTH9yn3RdQ/GkWzx OBTk3Du/PkAhynILY29tseLvJqcMTLHjURR61G+0juxueZQKh6XisRhQ8R66mw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1622530567; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=BfxpliwTZqs5fGMjfpPGduivbc8yfOD2CVcV3au5JFbxu4fDtNKMB6nADNSwRLUPxio6ss C8rnKwc9QsnMHW1ij+X4x0eU/FDOC+Zb/pwD1sWXfYA7t3GCipBolRaYuUMUgDAU4ISrWo ASQJ5wkvzY+6UHbxLMHoabN/qoUCQx2uEK8ukbs/TBZPLiWqROzbOH+WkPozb5rJ8a5Piw fsvGHPy7D3JEfihQEfUJjiit4QQ3qJi4IZxGxxUMzh9cL5kDbkWY/yIlRiPdBd99GO6lyy cT44nkBPW+S0FvizUNZX6gdEMBzccNW6tKP+oK05gp3bd62E0+vhDsUbRpb/RQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-BeenThere: dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Commit messages for the main branch of the src repository List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 06:56:08 -0000 On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 01:50:16PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 1:39 PM Jessica Clarke wrote: > > ... > > > > A hypothetical .gitlab/CODEOWNERS would be checked in as a generated > > file, if that was unclear. Otherwise I'm not sure I understand your > > first point? > > There's no need to generate anything. Both github and gitlab support a > CODEOWNERS file in the project's root. Let's just move it there. We can > delete the old MAINTAINERS, too, once all of its entries have been > converted. Why delete *our* correctly named MAINTAINERS? Tomorrow GH or GL could decide that "pwning" something bears unnecessary and potentially offending connotations and break the scheme. They want CODEOWNERS now? Fine, all it takes is a simple script to parse MAINTAINERS and generate CODEOWNERS file they want. Once/if this changes, we'd easily adapt. ./danfe