From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jun 24 01:35:11 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA03145
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 01:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA03139
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 01:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (narvi@localhost)
          by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id MAA28501; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 12:05:13 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 12:05:13 +0300 (EEST)
From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: WARNING:
In-Reply-To: <33AF5FD9.FF6D5DF@whistle.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970624120057.28103C-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, Julian Elischer wrote:

> pthreads under the 2.2 system is temporarily broken
> I thought I had it all and committed and then found a problem.
> (symbols being multiply defined in the library
> 
> e.g.
> _exit.o:
> 00000000 T __exit   <------------------
> 
> uthread_exit.o:
>          U __thread_cleanupspecific
>          U __thread_sys_write
>          U __thread_sys_close
>          U __thread_sys_fcntl
>          U __thread_dead
>          U _pthread_cleanup_pop
>          U __thread_kern_sched_state
>          U __thread_fd_table
>          U __thread_queue_deq
>          U _strcat
>          U __thread_link_list
>          U __thread_kern_sig_block
>          U __thread_sys__exit
>          U __thread_dtablesize
>          U __thread_run
>          U __thread_kern_pipe
>          U _setitimer
> 00000000 T __exit   <-----------------
> 000000cc T __thread_exit
> 000001c0 T _pthread_exit
> 
> I need to run now but will fix it after sleep.
> 
> luckily the threads lib is not really usable under 2.2 
> an dnot built by default so I doubt anyone is going to get bitten
> by this., but fixing it is my number 1 priority.

I am using it. To a little extent, but still.

Well, if you are already in the libc_r, could you also check clarify, why
the default Makefiel doesn't include uthread_attr_init? The function
pthread_attr_init is quite useful...

	Sander


	There is no love, no good, no happiness and no future -
	all these are just illusions.

> 
> In the mean-time while I sleep, if anyone with good knowledge of the 
> build and the linker etc, sees the deliberate mistake,
> let me know..
> I think I left out some mods from theoriginal patch file
> and will have to recover them from the -current tree
> where I did check them in originally.
> 
> julian
>