Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Mar 2016 21:06:03 -0800
From:      Jordan Hubbard <jkh@ixsystems.com>
To:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        Chris Torek <torek@torek.net>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: quotactl bug: vfs_busy never unbusy-es
Message-ID:  <5E893C41-BEF1-4A9B-8E32-6D8E12356252@ixsystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160312034410.GF1741@kib.kiev.ua>
References:  <20160310162916.GB1741@kib.kiev.ua> <201603112315.u2BNFsc0059323@elf.torek.net> <20160312034410.GF1741@kib.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On Mar 11, 2016, at 7:44 PM, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> Yes, if it work out to pass only mnt_ref-referenced mount point down
> to the VFS_QUOTACTL method, I am fine with it.  Also, I do not see why
> would it not work, in the sense that the failure modes due to parallel
> unmount are exactly the same for current code and what you propose.
>=20
> Please finish this.

He will. :-)

iXsystems is happy to sponsor this work as it directly benefits us as =
well, and I=E2=80=99ve been very happy to see you engaged with the =
review process.  With any luck, Chris will be able to finish this and =
then unwind his stack back to the point where he can finish wiring up =
NFS quotas to ZFS, which was the original feature request that started =
us down this path.

- Jordan




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5E893C41-BEF1-4A9B-8E32-6D8E12356252>