From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 05:05:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9DA16A4CE; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 05:05:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C866743D2D; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 05:05:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2LD5QRS022395; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 05:05:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.3/Submit) id i2LD5Qhr022394; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 05:05:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 05:05:26 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20040321050526.A22290@xorpc.icir.org> References: <200403211046.i2LAkDHK049730@repoman.freebsd.org> <405D7232.30400@freebsd.org> <20040321042705.A21986@xorpc.icir.org> <20040321123727.GB51452@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20040321123727.GB51452@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 04:37:27AM -0800 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: ru@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Scott Long cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/picobsd/build picobsd X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 13:05:27 -0000 On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 04:37:27AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 04:27:05AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > The advantage of having picobsd and all stripped down variants > > of FreeBSD in a port (perhaps with their own category) > > picobsd has had its own category for 2 years, and it has been sitting > there untouched with only one port in it ever since. In fact I've > been intending to remove the category soon and move that port back to > net/. The usual rule of thumb for a new category is that it must > contain 10 ports and have significant reason for a separate existence. ^^^ I would say that a sensible rule of thumb would include is the second part only. Otherwise by the same reasoning you should also kill arabic, hebrew, hungarian, plan9. Anyways, once you populate the category with picobsd, minibsd, nanobsd and friends, and the tinyware stuff, you quickly reach the critical mass. cheers luigi > Since picobsd seems to be essentially a dead project I'd need to be > convinced that the category should remain. > > Kris