From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb  6 14:14:32 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC58106564A
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun,  6 Feb 2011 14:14:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from stb@lassitu.de)
Received: from gilb.zs64.net (gilb.zs64.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:105e::1ea])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5676E8FC08
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun,  6 Feb 2011 14:14:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gilb.zs64.net (Postfix, from stb@lassitu.de) id CE894DD283;
	Sun,  6 Feb 2011 15:14:30 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik-4jeNTxgqiKykwGcm2JPY5vd0Axc+yk617sz8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 15:14:29 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B2044C9A-E2B3-4CF7-B30A-10A5D638C87A@lassitu.de>
References: <AANLkTik-4jeNTxgqiKykwGcm2JPY5vd0Axc+yk617sz8@mail.gmail.com>
To: spil.oss@gmail.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bridge, ipv6 and rtadvd
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 14:14:32 -0000

Am 06.02.2011 um 13:23 schrieb Spil Oss:

> Hi All,
>=20
> Don't know if this is expected behaviour.
>=20
> My LAN (bge0) and WLAN (wlan0) are bridged in bridge0. I tried to run
> rtadvd on bridge0 but that didn't result in ipv6 addresses on my
> network. Tried running rtadvd directly /usr/sbin/rtadvd -c
> /etc/rtadvd.conf -f -D and saw the requests coming in from the client
> but that didn't result in a working ipv6 network. "Wild guessing" I
> tried loading it with /usr/sbin/rtadvd -f -D bge0 and I had a
> functional ipv6 network.....
>=20
> Is this intended behaviour? Am I doing something wrong?

It appears to be intentional; there was some discussion a couple years =
back, and the current behavior is for virtual interfaces to not receive =
link-local addresses.

Since I prefer to have bridge0 as the "main" interface, I simply =
manually configured a link local address:

ipv6_enable=3D"YES"
ipv6_gateway_enable=3D"YES"
ipv6_network_interfaces=3D"bridge0 gif0"
ipv6_ifconfig_bridge0=3D"fe80::21c:c0ff:fe7d:8c50%bridge0"
ipv6_ifconfig_bridge0_alias0=3D"2001:470:1f0b:XXXX::1 prefixlen 64"
ipv6_ifconfig_gif0=3D"2001:470:1f0a:XXXX::2 2001:470:1f0a:XXXX::1 =
prefixlen 128"

$ cat /etc/rtadvd.conf=20
bridge0:\
	:addrs#1:addr=3D"2001:470:1f0b:XXXX::":raflags#64:

The IPv4 side of gif0 is brought up through a linkup script triggered by =
mpd when my DSL connection comes up; that also updates the endpoint =
address for the HE tunnel.

Oh, this is on -stable from Dec 4.

HTH,
Stefan

--=20
Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>   Fon +49 151 14070811