From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Mar 10 01:07:19 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA15752
          for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 10 Mar 1998 01:07:19 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA15727
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 10 Mar 1998 01:07:15 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36])
	by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA20367;
	Tue, 10 Mar 1998 09:07:04 GMT
Received: (from eivind@localhost)
	by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) id KAA08296;
	Tue, 10 Mar 1998 10:07:02 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <19980310100702.65530@follo.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 10:07:02 +0100
From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
To: tcobb@staff.circle.net
Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: UNION FS appropriate?
References: <8188AD2EBC3CD111B7A30060082F32A40C3FA3@freya.circle.net> <Pine.BSF.3.95.980309232825.19080C-100000@current1.whistle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980309232825.19080C-100000@current1.whistle.com>; from Julian Elischer on Mon, Mar 09, 1998 at 11:30:51PM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Mon, Mar 09, 1998 at 11:30:51PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> You don't need chroot.

I'm fairly certain Julian is trying to say 'union' here, just to clear
up any confusion.

> Have a single copy of each binary on the server, but have a link (hard
> link) to each chroot directory.
> that way you only need one copy of each.

Eivind.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message