From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 14 09:03:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F78106566C for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:03:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591998FC14 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id p8E92C8X081651 ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:02:26 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 168 Received: from niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.41]) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208081FEF1; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:02:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix, from userid 2005) id 015EC4179; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:02:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:02:45 +0200 From: Michel Talon To: Chad Perrin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110914090245.GA65375@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Miltered: at jchkmail.jussieu.fr with ID 4E706DB7.004 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4E706DB7.004/134.157.10.1/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ Cc: Subject: Re: *caution* severely OT!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:03:20 -0000 Chad wrote: > I really don't think I'd say that Common Lisp is "syntactically very > close to python [sic]". It's not fair to either Common Lisp or Python, On the contrary python is strikingly similar to a simplified version of lisp without parentesis. It is not an original opinion by far, see the following post of an eminent lisp hacker: http://norvig.com/python-lisp.html Of course lisp is considerably more complex if you begin to use more exotic features, but if you confine yourself to translating python code, it may be almost litteral translation, as explained in the link above. -- Michel TALON