From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 17 11:33:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9574637B423 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2000 11:33:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 25E1B1C41; Sun, 17 Sep 2000 14:33:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 14:33:40 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: Max Khon , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I'll be rolling a 4.1.1 release on September 25th Message-ID: <20000917143340.W47559@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <8934.969215053@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <8934.969215053@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 11:24:13AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 11:24:13AM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > Sigh. People do seem to be ignoring the "assigned to" field in the > PRs, something we only fill in when it's truly obvious that the > problem is wholly within the responsibility domain of a given > committer or not something that anyone else can even hope to > fix. There is a direct correlation between the Submitter being ignored by the Assigned To and the Submitter ignoring the Assigned To. I don't blame the contributor community for being a little more then pissed recently for having PRs with full explanations, how-to-repeats, and patches that work being ignored by unresponsive maintainers. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message