From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 06:51:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F2E16A4CE for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 06:51:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.gactr.uga.edu (mail.gactr.uga.edu [128.192.37.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32AEC43D1D for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 06:51:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robin.blanchard@gactr.uga.edu) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dummy.domain.name (Postfix) with SMTP id 88FB077249 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:51:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from EBE1.gc.nat (E2K1.gc.nat [10.10.11.21]) by mail.gactr.uga.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A10077242 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:51:01 -0500 (EST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:51:01 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Odd quirks after updating to 5.2... Thread-Index: AcPrgl4ZWnZkRlS7TTeD5yfhaS+DSAAdPFfg From: "Robin P. Blanchard" To: "Doug White" , "Peter Losher" cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Odd quirks after updating to 5.2... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:51:05 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Doug White > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 7:50 PM > To: Peter Losher > Cc: current@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Odd quirks after updating to 5.2... >=20 >=20 > On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Peter Losher wrote: >=20 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Ever since I updated one of our other boxes from 5.1 to 5.2, I have=20 > > been having issues with the periodic processes not finishing up=20 > > properly, which after a week or so fills up all the=20 > permitted forked=20 > > processes, and then causes FreeBSD to deprive itself of resources. >=20 > They weren't getting blocked in getblk or inode, were they?=20 > Thats one thing that we're still chasing. >=20 I'd be glad to offer ssh access to a 2650 that consistently exhibits = this behaviour in hopes to get -CURRENT primed for the masses. Any takers ?