From owner-cvs-all Mon Mar 11 5: 0:52 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.139.170]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA4937B404; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 05:00:42 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with UUCP id g2BD0a051214; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:00:36 GMT (envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.za) Received: from grimreaper (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.org (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g2BCvlDN032080; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:57:47 GMT (envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.za) Message-Id: <200203111257.g2BCvlDN032080@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: Bruce Evans Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/xlint/llib llib-lposix References: <20020311234858.I6802-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20020311234858.I6802-100000@gamplex.bde.org> ; from Bruce Evans "Mon, 11 Mar 2002 23:50:15 +1100." Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:57:46 +0000 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Fix a prototype to match our headers. I am not convinced that doing > > this in this file is the correct way round. (Maybe our definition of > > __assert is wrong?) > > __assert is an implementation detail. It can have any prototype that > the implementation wants. Good to know. Thanks! M -- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message