From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Nov 29 12:51:37 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA19260 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 12:51:37 -0800 Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA19252 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 12:51:25 -0800 Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA28536; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 13:44:12 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199511292044.NAA28536@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Compile problems with 2.1 To: ahill@interconnect.com.au (Anthony Hill) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 13:44:12 -0700 (MST) Cc: chuckr@glue.umd.edu, prefect@prefect.unomaha.edu, questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Anthony Hill" at Nov 29, 95 05:24:54 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 556 Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > device, and it's NOT an optional device, put it back in. > > I am doing this all the time - It would be great if someone popped a few > extra comments in LINT detailing which devices were optional, and which > were not. (Trial and error can get a bit tedious) It would be greater if the "optional" qualifier was removed from the files.i386 for the thing so that it was never removed, accidently or otherwise. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.