From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 12 19:12:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-239.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.239]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635DB37B402; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:12:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF62C66C76; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:12:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:12:11 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: rwatson@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: eaccess(2) breaks execution of 4.x binaries on 5.x Message-ID: <20020312191211.A78611@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject says it all, really; this is the cause of part of my problems in getting 5.x packages built on the bento cluster, because it seems that /bin/sh has come to depend on this syscall. Executing a 5.x /bin/sh on a 4.x system causes a SIGSYS if it hits this code (e.g. test -x /some/binary) Can this syscall be MFCed soon? Kris --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8jsOKWry0BWjoQKURAjFfAJ9kyQRfGjpldZz6toMlrrB95WRYNwCgmCs6 3VpcE/bvgzHRvRs+EXj54xI= =3HVr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message