From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 18:40:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941A416A4CE; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:40:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp [202.249.10.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEC143D1F; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:40:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp) Received: from ocean.jinmei.org (unknown [2001:4f8:3:bb:a883:d32e:3c11:f22d]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7250415272; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 03:39:59 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 03:40:04 +0900 Message-ID: From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman In-Reply-To: <20040923185841.GD959@green.homeunix.org> References: <20040922020957.GE84424@green.homeunix.org> <20040923185841.GD959@green.homeunix.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IPv6 route mutex recursion (crash) and fix X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:40:02 -0000 (resending, since the first attempt seems to have failed due to some DNS-related error) >>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:58:41 -0400, >>>>> Brian Fundakowski Feldman said: >> So, as a result, I tend to think the proposed patch is a reasonable >> fix to the problem. But please add the rationale as comments, since >> the background intent is a bit vague as shown by the question from >> George. > Thank you for your review. As you certainly are more knowledgable in KAME > code than I am, would you mind redoing this so that the style is more > closely matched; then I could take the change from the KAME repository? I'm willing to help you, but please let me check to be sure. Are you asking me to modify the KAME snap code based on your patch first, which you'll then merge back to FreeBSD? JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp