From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 6 13:49:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9773D16A4DE; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:49:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: from shodan.nognu.de (shodan.nognu.de [85.14.216.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447DC43D6E; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:49:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: by shodan.nognu.de (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 6AEB4B828; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:49:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:49:22 +0200 From: Frank Steinborn To: SUZUKI Shinsuke Mail-Followup-To: SUZUKI Shinsuke , max@love2party.net, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org References: <200608291637.k7TGbNxd002409@www.freebsd.org> <200609012122.53206.max@love2party.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Message-Id: <20060906134922.6AEB4B828@shodan.nognu.de> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/102647: Using pf stateful rules for inet6 fails for connections originating from the firewall itself to a service running on thesame box X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 13:49:28 -0000 SUZUKI Shinsuke wrote: > Hi, > > >>>>> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 21:22:45 +0200 > >>>>> max@love2party.net(Max Laier) said: > > > Thinking about this for a bit we might want to use the patch below > > instead. i.e. do the fixup locally in the pfil wrapper instead. This > > way other filters don't break if they have adapted to the new world > > order. > > > > Thoughts? Please test and report back, either way. > > I'm fine with your patch. (it is preferable to add a comment about > this hack, though) > > After the PR originator confirmed the fix, could you please commit it? > > Thanks, > ---- > SUZUKI, Shinsuke @ KAME Project I'm not sure if my first confirmation about the fix came through, so I'll resend to get sure. Well, as I said - the patch works fine here, I'm fine with it too. Would be nice to see in in -STABLE soon. Many thanks! Frank