From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Mar  6 11:17:57 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA15029
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 11:17:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA15024
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 11:17:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA11548; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 12:14:00 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199603061914.MAA11548@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: When is 2.2 Estimated to be released?
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 12:14:00 -0700 (MST)
Cc: mrl@teleport.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <363.826068972@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Mar 5, 96 03:36:12 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Yes, but it's still somewhat unclear.  Perhaps by the end of summer,
> though this could be moved ahead if we decide to punt on goals like
> devfs and PCCARD support.
> 
> 					Jordan
> 
> > The subject says it. Is there a goal for release?
> > 
> > Mostyn Lewis

Uh, what exactly would 2.2 have, then, if none of the planned major
features made it in?

Something like that should be called 2.1.1, not 2.2.0, IMO...


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.