From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 17 02:04:16 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA10867 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 02:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.crl.com (mail.crl.com [165.113.1.22]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA10862 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 02:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Haldjas.folklore.ee by mail.crl.com with SMTP id AA18251 (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for ); Wed, 17 Jul 1996 02:00:04 -0700 Received: (from narvi@localhost) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.6.12/8.6.12) id AAA19585; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 00:01:26 +0300 Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 00:01:25 +0300 (EET DST) From: Narvi To: Warner Losh Cc: jack , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: I'm re-rolling the 2.1.5 release. In-Reply-To: <199607161850.MAA15306@rover.village.org> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 16 Jul 1996, Warner Losh wrote: > I hate to say this, but shouldn't it become the 2.1.5.1R release? > > 1/2 :-) > > Warner > It might not be too bad - the Linux camp won't even have another bait - and it would be perfectly honest. 2.1.5-RELEASE is and was, but we (st. core team and all the rest of us) do not recomend it and it does not get distributed on a CD. 2.1.5.1 goes to the CD and on the ftp sites everything but the different bits will be links - additional space would come only from files which will actually change (some in the bin dist + possibly some others). But I don't think it is too bad if it just remains 2.1.5... OK with me. Sander PS. If you want this to make it to the list - please forward it! (otherwise it will most probably time out).