Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 Oct 2010 02:07:25 +0000 (UTC)
From:      Pyun YongHyeon <yongari@FreeBSD.org>
To:        cvs-src-old@freebsd.org
Subject:   cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_rl.c
Message-ID:  <201010270207.o9R27i5h063115@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
yongari     2010-10-27 02:07:25 UTC

  FreeBSD src repository

  Modified files:        (Branch: RELENG_7)
    sys/pci              if_rl.c 
  Log:
  SVN rev 214408 on 2010-10-27 02:07:25Z by yongari
  
  MFC r213796:
    Rewrite interrupt handler to give fairness for both RX and TX.
    Previously rl(4) continuously checked whether there are RX events
    or TX completions in forever loop. This caused TX starvation under
    high RX load as well as consuming too much CPU cycles in the
    interrupt handler. If interrupt was shared with other devices which
    may be always true due to USB devices in these days, rl(4) also
    tried to process the interrupt. This means polling(4) was the only
    way to mitigate the these issues.
  
    To address these issues, rl(4) now disables interrupts when it
    knows the interrupt is ours and limit the number of iteration of
    the loop to 16. The interrupt would be enabled again before exiting
    interrupt handler if the driver is still running. Because RX buffer
    is 64KB in size, the number of iterations in the loop has nothing
    to do with number of RX packets being processed. This change
    ensures sending TX frames under high RX load.
  
    RX handler drops a driver lock to pass received frames to upper
    stack such that there is a window that user can down the interface.
    So rl(4) now checks whether driver is still running before serving
    RX or TX completion in the loop.
  
    While I'm here, exit interrupt handler when driver initialized
    controller.
  
    With this change, now rl(4) can send frames under high RX load even
    though the TX performance is still not good(rl(4) controllers can't
    queue more than 4 frames at a time so low TX performance was one of
    design issue of rl(4) controllers). It's much better than previous
    TX starvation and you should not notice RX performance drop with
    this change. Controller still shows poor performance under high
    network load but for many cases it's now usable without resorting
    to polling(4).
  
  Revision    Changes    Path
  1.170.2.17  +28 -16    src/sys/pci/if_rl.c



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201010270207.o9R27i5h063115>