Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:28:05 -0500
From:      Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
To:        Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Enabling GSSAPI with evolution
Message-ID:  <1077557285.787.2.camel@gyros>
In-Reply-To: <1077527763.2402.20.camel@herring.nlsystems.com>
References:  <1077452033.2402.7.camel@herring.nlsystems.com> <1077478546.75628.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1077490936.2402.16.camel@herring.nlsystems.com> <1077491135.75628.25.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1077527763.2402.20.camel@herring.nlsystems.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-1t10gL4iPagbXp5vSdlH
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 04:16, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 23:05, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 18:02, Doug Rabson wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 19:35, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 07:13, Doug Rabson wrote:
> > > > > I've been using GSSAPI authentication with evolution for a while =
now and
> > > > > apart from problems when the tickets expire (which seems to be a =
heimdal
> > > > > issue as far as I can see), it works great. This patch enables GS=
SAPI if
> > > > > its installed:
> > > >=20
> > > > Thanks for the patch!  What's the impact of doing this by default? =
 What
> > > > kind of effect will this have on non-krb users?
> > >=20
> > > As far as I can see, none. If you haven't build kerberos, then the
> > > configure tests for mit kerberos and heimdal will both fail and it wo=
n't
> > > try to build the feature.
> >=20
> > But what about a system where Kerberos was installed (perhaps out of
> > sysinstall), but it's not being used?  I don't think this will cause an=
y
> > negative impact, but I wanted to be sure.
>=20
> In that case, GSSAPI will appear as an authentication alternative in the
> settings dialog but it will not work if selected. The user can still
> select one of the alternatives.

Good enough for me.  I'll commit this later today.  Thanks again.

Joe

>=20
>=20
--=20
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc



--=-1t10gL4iPagbXp5vSdlH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBAOjgkb2iPiv4Uz4cRAhIpAJ9sxBZUw6/wqd9hkUszH/NzEew1LwCdGfi0
i6rZL6LHcr8SUJMZFj/jao8=
=jiAl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-1t10gL4iPagbXp5vSdlH--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1077557285.787.2.camel>