From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 08:59:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECAC106566B; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 08:59:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801408FC0A; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 08:59:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwd18 with SMTP id wd18so10673252obb.13 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 00:59:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1fXglzQqTHi8Cm7g9AWDjf3IlgeKJfz3tgmJIpKcMCw=; b=wDr/UW2e1g35WsMQyFEk4KFrtSf/D/HNikdbz6kJZAtFEUZMKWE63GFlGg+qZAPHYa y+E8YAXd8v8ynR80BfrwbhKPMom9j+WuMcFAlei2thbDWLdGI+3dAXFIP+frUwIxd3Cy aSRN+MjYXGXrDPI+UMONS5RgsktiuenGRnHKw= Received: by 10.50.88.170 with SMTP id bh10mr29871294igb.8.1324976346281; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 00:59:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.207.7 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 00:58:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EF9858D.9000607@FreeBSD.org> References: <201112251903.pBPJ39SJ037714@repoman.freebsd.org> <1Reu5F-000KFr-GV@internal.tormail.net> <20111226060601.GA68567@FreeBSD.org> <4EF9858D.9000607@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 08:58:35 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: j-vdQudH8EVt9L21SddBvJMpj6A Message-ID: To: Alex Dupre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev , Jan Beich , cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Rene Ladan Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net-p2p/amule Makefile ports/net-p2p/amule/files patch-configure X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 08:59:08 -0000 2011/12/27 Alex Dupre : > Alexey Dokuchaev ha scritto: > >>> It's not... but there's no need to specify LICENSE_FILE for a known >>> licence. >> >> >> Right, so perhaps this line should be dropped completely, not just >> commented >> out. =A0On a related note, thanks for removing LICENSE_FILE knobs for kn= own >> standard licenses, we need to cure this abuse for quite a while. > > > Well, actually the license framework documentation says exactly the > opposite, it recommends to set LICENSE_FILE also for known licenses. Oh dear.... reading bsd.licenses.mk shows that there's no 'pool' of known licenses, which means that doing stuff like LICENSE=3DGPLv2 without LICENSE_FILE violates the GPL. I'll look at making a 'pool', now where to store it... Chris