Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 12:07:14 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: John Dyson <dyson@dyson.iquest.net> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: In case anyone's interested in P5 vs P6 benchmarks. Message-ID: <5883.835297634@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 20 Jun 1996 13:33:54 CDT." <199606201833.NAA09813@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The p6 times were done on 2.1. Relative to 2.1, 2.2 is approx 2x > faster on Execl throughput, pipe throughput, shell scripts and fork times. > The 2.2 code gives you 'almost p6 on 2.1' VM performance on a P5. Oh damn, damn damn damn damn. Sorry, wrong timings! [blush] Let me go find the run I did on calweb before it was downgraded to 2.1. I never meant to mix and match the two! Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5883.835297634>