Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:03:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Flaschberger <if@xip.at> To: "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: funny ECMP Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008242102410.12708@filebunker.xip.at> In-Reply-To: <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4307F1FF79@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008230154280.29368@filebunker.xip.at> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008240144350.12708@filebunker.xip.at> <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4307F1FC70@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008240223240.12708@filebunker.xip.at> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008242005160.12708@filebunker.xip.at> <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4307F1FF22@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008242027390.12708@filebunker.xip.at> <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4307F1FF79@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Li, > I am trying to figure out, if the routing table have > > 10.13.13.0/24 10.11.11.1 > 10.13.13.0/24 link#1 > > And if I do "ssh 10.13.13.2", which route should be used? the route with the lower weight. if they have the same weight, use any of them. in arp-lookup code, the lowest weight + without gateway should be choosen. Kind regards, Ingo Flaschgberger
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LFD.2.00.1008242102410.12708>