From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 24 11:21:19 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537891065670;
	Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:21:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from egrosbein@rdtc.ru)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13::5])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA28D8FC14;
	Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:21:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1OBLHXO081913;
	Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:21:17 +0700 (NOVT)
	(envelope-from egrosbein@rdtc.ru)
Message-ID: <4F4772AD.5030406@rdtc.ru>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:21:17 +0700
From: Eugene Grosbein <egrosbein@rdtc.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; ru-RU;
	rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110112 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
References: <CAFMmRNxF1uMOr39BbZkpPN=uM7G09dtcckAYw8ag6n6bi=FeOw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJ-FndDHsQRRNmrS7fsELEVohozWvvfaZ6eW_GipwHdjU9ZwxA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFMmRNyPkwx3hRtraq6QL64kibAeV3W23FE34T1oDnf9SVFOYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-FndD3366-uT191jMva3P-uL0DHi6nFeRfdsKA1hbJW7WqEA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-FndD3366-uT191jMva3P-uL0DHi6nFeRfdsKA1hbJW7WqEA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:10:09 +0000
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Kernel threads inherit CPU affinity from random sibling
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:21:19 -0000

28.01.2012 20:22, Attilio Rao пишет:

> 2012/1/28 Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>:
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> I think what you found out is very sensitive.
>>> However, the patch is not correct as you cannot call
>>> cpuset_setthread() with thread_lock held.
>>
>> Whoops!  I actually discovered that for myself and had already fixed
>> it, but apparently I included an old version of the patch in the
>> email.
>>
>>> Hence this is my fix:
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/cpuset_root.patch
>>
>> Oh, I do like this better.  I tried something similar myself but
>> abandoned it because I misread how sched_affinity() was implemented by
>> 4BSD(I had gotten the impression that once TSF_AFFINITY is set it
>> could never be cleared).
> 
> Do you have a pathological test-case for it? Are you going to test the patch?

I have the pathological test-case for it:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165444

Eugene Grosbein