From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 23 16:52:50 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2824C106566B;
	Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:52:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.214.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A128FC0C;
	Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:52:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so3698150bkc.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=zupi3AZVozB5xOravPI9kLpFOT6LAxbVGutHRMhuvEA=;
	b=nnDstHpyRwqblnLDnmGq97BFeiA3skXEiwY8Ax1k/gmgGHt87iinvO38KKD491AusX
	NppHsul4lEAVmjP4HaMKIdivaW5ZeDP75TA+qHbC62cA75TlGOsu0rT1VeYNo72Lmfhr
	AN6gQ+hj8bqaO0KdaZo1crFJlfGySKL6HP3fD0rIOKOK66wMgOFbJxeFc+Ar3Wk6HVxH
	6Nsj0RkST1/kgG73gQK4p2SEinzbK+LvlY3zyumfpTVjkAfhkbHUlFMuG5oNaKWcrLAn
	pIveu10Yxx/ejuBm8kUH7I9PNS6AHaMjbuRWFFmEIIU91lKriARvt2Nr1Paf3575rYfq
	AhSA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.153.219 with SMTP id l27mr5000146bkw.126.1332521568361;
	Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120323154105.GB84340@DataIX.net>
References: <20120323154105.GB84340@DataIX.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:52:48 +0000
Message-ID: <CADLo83_47PPrKGGhsr48-7D6BrD+jzM0HRwmQtES3G=5jSqroA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To: Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, dougb@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:52:50 -0000

On 23 Mar 2012 15:41, "Jason Hellenthal" <jhellenthal@dataix.net> wrote:
>
>
> Hey Doug,
>
> Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening
> ?
>
> If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use
> bind from ports... upon running (make delete-old) from source it
> attempts to remove empty directories from /etc/named/*. When doing this
> it can only remove empty directories and since master & slave usually
> will have something in it on most systems dynamic gets removed but left
> to be re-created from /etc/rc.d/named on the next boot.
>
> Do you think it would be possible to "for say" create a
> USING_BIND_FROM_PORTS make.conf var that could be compared during the
> (make delete-old) stage so it does not attempt to do anything with
> /etc/named/* ? but yet still allow it to operate on the rest of the
> stale files.
>

Would it be too hackish to have a file .keepme in the dynamic directory?

Chris