Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 20:09:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Søren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> Cc: "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>, tlambert2@mindspring.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jandrese@mitre.org Subject: Re: Real "technical comparison" Message-ID: <200105311809.f4VI9C896896@freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105311437310.9434-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva> "from Rik van Riel at May 31, 2001 02:43:35 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems Rik van Riel wrote: > > At www.spec.org I see SPECweb99 numbers for Solaris, AIX, > > Linux, Windows, Tru64, and HP-UX. FreeBSD must be hiding, > > because I don't see it. BSDI, Walnut Creek, and WindRiver > > all have failed to submit results. > > > Linux is still #1 for 1 to 4 processors. The 8-way results > > need to be redone on newer hardware (Windows is ahead now) > > and Linux doesn't have 6-way or 12-way numbers. > > Last I heard the 8-way result with Windows had an "NC" > (not qualified) next to it. OTOH, Linux' 8-way numbers > still leave a lot to be desired ... > > > Go on, show some numbers. Stop hiding. > > *nod* If somebody sends me the 800 US$ the software costs, or better get me the software for free (we are a free OS right) I'll gladly run it through a variety of machines here... -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105311809.f4VI9C896896>