From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 31 11: 9:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from freebsd.dk (fw-rl0.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942EF37B422 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 11:09:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sos@freebsd.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by freebsd.dk (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4VI9C896896; Thu, 31 May 2001 20:09:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos) From: Søren Schmidt Message-Id: <200105311809.f4VI9C896896@freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: Real "technical comparison" In-Reply-To: "from Rik van Riel at May 31, 2001 02:43:35 pm" To: Rik van Riel Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 20:09:11 +0200 (CEST) Cc: "Albert D. Cahalan" , tlambert2@mindspring.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jandrese@mitre.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL88 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It seems Rik van Riel wrote: > > At www.spec.org I see SPECweb99 numbers for Solaris, AIX, > > Linux, Windows, Tru64, and HP-UX. FreeBSD must be hiding, > > because I don't see it. BSDI, Walnut Creek, and WindRiver > > all have failed to submit results. > > > Linux is still #1 for 1 to 4 processors. The 8-way results > > need to be redone on newer hardware (Windows is ahead now) > > and Linux doesn't have 6-way or 12-way numbers. > > Last I heard the 8-way result with Windows had an "NC" > (not qualified) next to it. OTOH, Linux' 8-way numbers > still leave a lot to be desired ... > > > Go on, show some numbers. Stop hiding. > > *nod* If somebody sends me the 800 US$ the software costs, or better get me the software for free (we are a free OS right) I'll gladly run it through a variety of machines here... -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message