From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 02:19:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA3D16A41A for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:19:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from heceta.db.net (heceta.db.net [142.46.199.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C1943D69 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:19:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from heceta.db.net ([142.46.199.182] helo=localhost ident=mailnull) by heceta.db.net with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FcYrf-0000Ay-8x; Sat, 06 May 2006 22:19:19 -0400 Received: from localhost.dbn ([127.0.0.1] helo=night.db.net) by night.db.net with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FcYs0-000Og0-E7; Sat, 06 May 2006 22:19:40 -0400 Received: (from db@localhost) by night.db.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k472Jb9j094859; Sat, 6 May 2006 22:19:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from db@night.db.net) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 22:19:36 -0400 From: Diane Bruce To: Lyndon Nerenberg Message-ID: <20060507021936.GA94772@night.db.net> References: <200605051346.39823.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <20060505175533.GA3384@xor.obsecurity.org> <200605051414.02384.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <1146867318.62735.9.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20060505200804.I49507@orthanc.ca> <1146907329.72215.5.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20060506233615.GG720@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: An autoconf bikeshed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 02:19:26 -0000 On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 04:39:01PM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > On May 6, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > >The far bigger problem is that OSs don't adhere to the POSIX standard ... > But it is broad enough to cover the vast majority of tools that > currently use autoconf. Actually I agree with this. The real point of my somewhat brief comment was to point out is there are quite a few programmers who wouldn't know what portability was, if it hit them in their face. In some cases it is easier to ignore their Makefiles and just start from scratch. -- - db@db.net http://www.db.net/~db