From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 00:15:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B157106564A; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 00:15:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (ip-2-2-0-2.r20.asbnva02.us.ce.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:0:5000::16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D288FC08; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 00:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonderland.m5p.com (wonderland.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:418:3fd::19]) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q230EvDb037158; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 19:15:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Message-ID: <4F516281.30603@m5p.com> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:14:57 -0500 From: George Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd References: <4F2F7B7F.40508@FreeBSD.org> <4F366E8F.9060207@FreeBSD.org> <4F367965.6000602@FreeBSD.org> <4F396B24.5090602@FreeBSD.org> <4F3978BC.6090608@FreeBSD.org> <4F3990EA.1080002@FreeBSD.org> <4F3C0BB9.6050101@FreeBSD.org> <4F3E807A.60103@FreeBSD.org> <4F3E8858.4000001@FreeBSD.org> <4F4ACF2C.50300@m5p.com> <4F4B67AB.40907@m5p.com> <4F4C17E2.2040101@m5p.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mailhost.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:418:3fd::f7]); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:15:03 -0500 (EST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on IPv6:2001:418:3fd::f7 Cc: Olivier Smedts , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:15:04 -0000 On 03/02/12 18:06, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi George, > > Have you thought about providing schedgraph traces with your > particular workload? > > I'm sure that'll help out the scheduler hackers quite a bit. > > THanks, > > > Adrian > I posted a couple back in December but I haven't created any more recently: http://www.m5p.com/~george/ktr-ule-problem.out http://www.m5p.com/~george/ktr-ule-interact.out To the best of my knowledge, no one ever examined them. -- George