From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 23 13:43:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607BF1065678 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:43:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nec556@retena.com) Received: from resmaa14.ono.com (smtp14.ono.com [62.42.230.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83D98FC0A for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from GogPortatil.retena.com (85.219.71.98) by resmaa14.ono.com (8.5.113) (authenticated as nec556@retena.com) id 4EFDA80600B0354D; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:38:11 +0100 Message-ID: <4EFDA80600B0354D@> (added by postmaster@resmaa14.ono.com) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:38:55 +0100 To: "O. Hartmann" , Current FreeBSD From: Eduardo Morras In-Reply-To: <4F462189.3040106@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4F462189.3040106@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Antivirus: AVG for E-mail 2012.0.1913 [2114/4826] Cc: Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:43:59 -0000 At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote: >Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even >for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is >written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE >was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated >version in the ports suited our needs. > >Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I >filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. > >I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use >CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried >devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of >configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and >not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. > >devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many >of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, >but it is marked "broken" on FreeBSD. > >Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, >I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the >focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks >is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. > >Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm >also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity >to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE >is needed. > >Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have information about how to configure for use with clang/llvm. >Oliver