From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 5 9:58: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.roe35.lth2.k12.il.us (unknown [209.175.240.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5963137B401 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 09:58:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dallen@roe35.lth2.k12.il.us) Received: from dougs_laptop (dougs_laptop [209.175.240.20]) by mail.roe35.lth2.k12.il.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA31238 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 12:02:04 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dallen@roe35.lth2.k12.il.us) Message-ID: <200108051203370733.0093DA8F@mail.roe35.lth2.k12.il.us> X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.00.01.02 (1) Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 12:03:37 -0500 From: "Douglas G. Allen" To: "FreeBSD Stable Listserv" Subject: arp doesn't like two NIC's in same subnet on same machine? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a machine running 4.3-RELEASE, with softupdates enabled. I have two= Intel 100 Pro NIC's in the machine, an Adaptec controller card, and an 18G= Ultra160 drive in it (running at 80, if it makes any difference). I have= the default route to the router set to always go out through fxp0. When= both fxp0 and fxp1 are enabled, I get complaints from arp about inquiries= going out from fxp0 having answers received on fxp1. Everything else= 'seems' to be ok. The box is running as a web server with each NIC= referenced for different sites in different DNS A records. Is there an easy way to get rid of the arp message? Do I need to make fxp0= a gateway for fxp1? Do I need to install routed or gated on this box? I= would really like to fix this without having to install routed or gated. Another thing that may be related. When I enabled firewall rules on the= box (ipfw, rc.firewall), nothing was reachable outside my own LAN. I'm= going to risk looking silly, but it would seem to me that if I need to= make fxp0 a gateway for fxp1, then the firewall rules need to reference= only fxp0 (since presumably all traffic would route through it). I'm= firewalling on the machine to give some redundancy, as the LAN is already= firewalled with a dedicated firewall. Thanks in advance. Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message