From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 17 17:11:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from panzer.plutotech.com (panzer.plutotech.com [206.168.67.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D906153CA for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 17:10:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ken@panzer.plutotech.com) Received: (from ken@localhost) by panzer.plutotech.com (8.9.3/8.8.5) id SAA35985; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:10:25 -0700 (MST) From: "Kenneth D. Merry" Message-Id: <199903180110.SAA35985@panzer.plutotech.com> Subject: Re: How to add a new bootdevice to the new boot code ??? In-Reply-To: <19990318003058.B26117@keltia.freenix.fr> from Ollivier Robert at "Mar 18, 1999 0:30:58 am" To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:10:25 -0700 (MST) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ollivier Robert wrote... > According to David E . O'Brien: > > If not, can we PLEASE rename SCSI disks back to ``sd''? > > I'm tempted to agree. Many people I know who are upgrading to 3.* are > somewhat pissed off by the renaming, even if it is in the release > notes. They don't see any good reason for it... Do we have to go over this again and again? It'll be worse if we change back. And it's not like anyone had to upgrade their fstab -- all of the sd devices still work, since the major number is the same. So there's not a lot of room for complaint here. (Yeah, I'm sure someone will start squawking about it right about now.) So, just let it rest. There are lots of more pressing things to worry about. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@plutotech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message